CMS & Web/Comparison

CMS security compared: WordPress, Drupal, Joomla, TYPO3, Ghost and static sites

Six ways to run a website, scored on security process, extension risk, updates, support windows and attack surface. The right choice depends less on the code than on the routine you can keep.

High impact6 min readSmall business, Admins, DevelopersUpdated 31 October 2026

Fingerprint of this page: sha256("/cms/cms-security-compared/")

Choosing a content management system means choosing a security routine. Every platform in this comparison can run a safe website, and every one of them has been broken into on sites that skipped updates or stacked up extensions. What differs is how much work the safe state takes, how long a version gets fixes and how much code faces the internet. We score six options on those points so you can pick the one your team will actually keep up with.

Seven criteria that decide day to day safety

A (content management system) is the software editors use to change a site without touching code. Its security depends on the people who fix it and on the habits it encourages. We scored each option from 1 to 5 on these criteria, and higher is always better:

  • Core security process: a dedicated security team, a clear way to report flaws, published advisories and predictable release days.
  • Low extension risk: how much danger add-ons bring, given the size of the ecosystem and any review or coverage rules.
  • Update automation: whether security fixes reach the site without a person logging in.
  • Long-term support: published end of life dates and how long a version keeps receiving fixes.
  • Small : how much code is reachable from the internet while the site runs.
  • Admin protection: multi-factor authentication (MFA) and login rate limits out of the box.
  • Low maintenance effort: the skill and time needed to keep the site in a safe state.

One pattern holds across all of them: the core is rarely the weakest part. Most publicly reported WordPress vulnerabilities concern plugins and themes rather than WordPress itself, and extensions carry the same kind of risk on the other platforms. A core has a security team. An add-on may have one part-time maintainer, or none. So the size and quality of the extension ecosystem matters as much as the core.

Interactive comparison

CMS platforms compared by security

Editorial scores from 1 to 5 for teams that run their own website, where higher is always better.

What matters to you?
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
All scores in a table
CriterionGhostStatic site generatorJoomlaTYPO3DrupalWordPress
Core security process
Low extension risk
Update automation
Long-term support
Small attack surface
Admin protection
Low maintenance effort

Editorial assessment as of 31 October 2026. Scores from 1 to 5, higher is better. Your weights only change the order.

WordPress: easy to update, easy to overload

WordPress has a large, experienced security team and a long record of shipping fixes quickly. Minor core releases, which carry security fixes, install automatically by default, and since version 5.5 you can switch on automatic updates for each plugin and theme. The catch is the support policy: only the latest version is officially supported. The security team backports fixes to older branches as a courtesy, but you should not plan around that.

The weak spots are mostly the ones you add. The plugin directory is huge and quality varies widely, from well funded teams to abandoned hobby projects. Core has no built-in MFA and no limit on failed logins, and both the login page and xmlrpc.php are public by default. Each of these is fixable with a few settings and one or two well maintained plugins, which is why WordPress scores high on updates but low on extension risk and admin protection.

Drupal and TYPO3: long support, more engineering

Drupal has a dedicated security team, a security release window on the third Wednesday of each month and a published release schedule. Minor versions arrive roughly every six months, and two minor versions at a time receive security advisories. Contributed modules are covered only if their maintainers opt in, and the project page says so. Drupal 10 reaches end of life on 9 December 2026, the same week Drupal 12 is planned to ship, so Drupal 10 sites need an upgrade plan now.

Drupal core includes , which blocks repeated failed logins, while MFA comes from contributed modules. Updates usually run through , the PHP dependency manager, which suits teams with a developer and a deployment pipeline better than a lone editor.

TYPO3 uses a long-term support () model. TYPO3 v14 LTS was released on 21 April 2026 and receives bug fixes until 31 December 2027 and security patches until 30 June 2029, while v13 LTS is still maintained. After the free LTS period, paid Extended LTS is available. The backend ships with MFA, and the security team publishes advisories for core and for extensions. Like Drupal, TYPO3 is usually built and maintained by an agency or an in-house developer, which shows in the effort score.

Joomla and Ghost: the middle ground

Joomla publishes clear support dates, though the project calls them tentative. The 6.x series, released on 14 October 2025, is planned to receive security fixes until 16 October 2029, and 5.x until 12 October 2027. MFA is built into the core, core updates install with one click from the administrator panel, and the Joomla Security Strike Team handles reports about the core. Extensions vary in quality, as everywhere, but the ecosystem is smaller than that of WordPress.

Ghost is a focused publishing platform built on Node.js. It has no server-side plugin system: you change its look with themes and connect other services through its APIs and webhooks, which removes a whole class of risk. Staff logins from unknown devices must be confirmed with a code sent by email, and login attempts are limited to five per hour per IP address. Self-hosted installs update with one command line call, but someone has to run it.

The current major version is Ghost 6.x. The previous major gets critical fixes as the LTS line, and Ghost 5.x reached end of life in January 2026. Ghost treats every staff user as trusted, including the ability to add scripts, so invite only people you would hand the keys to.

Static site generators: the smallest live surface

A (Hugo, Jekyll, Eleventy and many others) turns templates and text files into plain HTML before deployment. The live server delivers files and runs no CMS code, no database and no login page. That is why this option scores highest on attack surface. There is no single security team, though: each generator is its own open-source project, and your exposure sits mostly in the build tools and themes you pull in.

The risk does not vanish, it moves. The build pipeline, its dependencies, the git hosting account and the deploy keys now hold the power an admin login used to hold. Contact forms and comments rely on third party services, and you still need HTTPS and security headers. Editors without technical skills may need a headless CMS on top, which brings its own login and updates back.

Which one fits whom

SituationGood fitWhy
Small business, one editor, no developerWordPress with few plugins, or GhostAutomatic updates and a simple admin, as long as extensions stay few
Brochure site that rarely changesStatic site generatorAlmost nothing to attack at runtime and little to patch
Complex site with roles, workflows and several languagesDrupal or TYPO3Fine-grained permissions and predictable support, maintained by a developer or agency
Mid-sized site that wants MFA without extrasJoomlaMFA in core and published support dates
Newsletter and membership publishingGhostNo plugin layer and a focused feature set

The risk does not vanish with a static site, it moves to the pipeline and the accounts behind it.

Sources and further reading

  1. WordPress: Securitywordpress.org
  2. Drupal core release scheduledrupal.org
  3. Drupal security advisory policydrupal.org
  4. TYPO3 v14 LTS announcementnews.typo3.com
  5. Joomla development roadmapdeveloper.joomla.org
  6. Ghost major versions and LTSdocs.ghost.org

General information, checked on 31 October 2026. Test changes on one system first and keep a way back. Found something outdated? Tell the editors.

FAQ

Questions readers ask

Is WordPress less secure than Drupal or TYPO3?

Not at the core level. WordPress core is well maintained and updates itself for minor releases. The difference is the ecosystem and the defaults: WordPress sites tend to run more plugins and have no MFA or login limits in core, so the safe state takes more discipline.

What does long-term support mean for a CMS?

An LTS version receives security fixes for a published period, often several years, without forcing you onto new features. TYPO3 is the clearest example. It lets you plan major upgrades instead of rushing them.

Are static sites completely safe?

No. The live site has very little to attack, but the build pipeline, dependencies, git host and hosting account become the targets. Protect those accounts with MFA and keep build dependencies up to date.

How many plugins are too many?

There is no fixed number. Each plugin should have a clear job, an active maintainer and recent updates. If you cannot say why a plugin is installed, remove it.

Keep reading

More from CMS & Web